Spring Boot vs Plain Spring — Deep Comparison
PLAIN SPRING mein, application setup mein KAAFI MANUAL DECISIONS lene padते hain — DataSource KAISE configure karein, Tomcat KAISE embed karein, JSON serialization KAUN SI library use karein, dependency VERSIONS kaise MATCH karein. Ye FLEXIBILITY deta hai, LEKIN TIME lagता hai aur ERROR-PRONE hai.
SPRING BOOT SAB DECISIONS "PRE-MADE" karta hai — @SpringBootApplication annotation, STARTER dependencies, auto-configuration — SAB MILKE, setup ko MINUTES se SECONDS tak LE AATE hain. Behind the scenes, Spring Boot APPS STILL Spring hi use karti hain — ApplicationContext, beans, DI — SAB SAME rehta hai.
// PLAIN SPRING — manual, verbose:
@Configuration
@EnableWebMvc
@ComponentScan("com.example")
public class WebConfig implements WebMvcConfigurer {
@Bean
public ViewResolver viewResolver() { /* manual setup */ }
// + separate Tomcat deployment (WAR file, external server)
}
// SPRING BOOT — concise, automatic:
@SpringBootApplication
public class MyApp {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(MyApp.class, args);
// Embedded Tomcat, ViewResolver, JSON — SAB automatic
}
}- Plain Spring = maximum control, manual setup, MORE time
- Spring Boot = pre-made decisions, MINIMAL setup, LESS time
- RUNTIME performance SAME — Spring Boot INTERNALLY Spring hi hai
RARE cases hain jaha plain Spring PREFER kiya jaata hai — EXTREME fine-grained control chahiye (Boot ki auto-configuration "magic" AVOID karni ho), ya EXISTING legacy application server (WebLogic) mein deploy karna ho (embedded server NAHI chahiye).
--debug flag se application run karте hi, Spring Boot EXACTLY REPORT karta hai — KAUN SI auto-configurations APPLY hui, KAUN SI SKIP hui (aur KYUN). Ye "CONDITIONS EVALUATION REPORT" auto-configuration ki "MAGIC" ko DEMYSTIFY karta hai.
java -jar myapp.jar --debug
# Output mein milta hai:
# CONDITIONS EVALUATION REPORT
# Positive matches: (jo APPLY hui)
# Negative matches: (jo SKIP hui, aur KYUN)